Caretaker awarded €95,000 for back problem sustained emptying bin

Limerick County Council

4 July 2021

A cemetery caretaker who injured his lower back while attempting to empty a rubbish bin has been awarded more than €95,000 by the High Court.

Dermot Price (61), who worked in the Limerick City and County Council-operated cemetery in Castlemungret, Co Limerick, sued the council over two accidents involving his work emptying bins.

The council denied the claims and argued that much, if not all of his complaints in relation to his lower back and his shoulder were referable to long-standing degenerative changes in those areas.

They were, it was argued, attributable to his age and his previous sporting activity playing rugby as a young man.

Mr Justice Robert Barr found the council was negligent in relation to the first accident, on January 6th, 2014, in which he injured his back. The council was not negligent in relation to the second accident more than a year later, on March 19th, 2015, when he said he injured his right shoulder.

The judge however said the shoulder injury must be “seen as a continuum” which began with the first accident and got progressively worse thereafter, culminating in the deterioration after March 2015.

He awarded him €95,379, including €26,827 for loss of earnings and €9,197 for loss of pension entitlements.

Missing handles

In his first action, Mr Price said he injured his back when trying to remove a steel inner lining from a full black bin. He claimed handles on the bin were missing and defective as were other bins in the cemetery.

He said he had brought this to the attention of his employer and also said when there were no black bags to line the bins, it could take a number of days to be supplied with them and this was why there was no liner in the bin on January 6th, 2014.

He was out of work for two weeks after the accident but continued to receive treatment.

He said the second accident happened while he was pushing a 1,100 litre wheelie bin up an incline towards the cemetery gate. While he had help from two colleagues, as they were about three quarters of the way up the incline, he felt an onset of severe pain in his right shoulder.

He did not report what happened but had to seek medical attention and was out of work for 27 months afterwards.

Mr Justice Barr was satisfied that liability for the first accident rested with the council for its failure to take account of complaints in relation to the defective condition of the bins and a failure to regularly inspect and repair or replace them. There was no contributory negligence on Mr Price’s part.

He was also satisfied he was an honest and forthright man who gave a truthful account as a witness of his dealings with the defendant and of the circumstances of the two accidents.

Source: Irish Times

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...