Careless HSE blamed for bed delay

29 September 2010

CARELESSNESS IN the HSE caused an eight-year delay in processing an elderly woman’s application for a public long-term care bed, Ombudsman and Information Commissioner Emily O’Reilly has found.

An investigation published yesterday by Ms O’Reilly found the woman’s son, who had been left in debt by the delay, should be paid compensation of €56,500.

The results of two other investigations were also published.

One case looked at the non- implementation of decisions made by a HSE appeals officer which resulted in a payout of more than €100,000 to 15 parties.

Another examined the non-payment of disability allowance to a young man who was placed in a care service in Northern Ireland.

In all three cases, Ms O’Reilly found “the action or inaction of the public bodies concerned was contrary to fair or sound administration”. But she did welcome the “constructive engagement” of the public bodies and said it reflected their commitment to better standards.

In the case involving the elderly woman the report said she had been resident in a private nursing home in Galway. The fees there were being met in part from her State pension and a means-tested nursing-home subvention. The balance was paid by her son.

The woman’s GP first applied for a public long-term care bed for her in 1995, but there were no results. After further applications and a complaint to the ombudsman the woman was provided with a public bed in 2004, a few months before her death. Her son owed €15,000 in arrears to the private nursing home incurred while she awaited a public placement.

Ms O’Reilly found the failure to process the original application was a result of carelessness. She recommended that when reviewing or designing schemes of priority for the services it provides, the HSE should ensure they are open, transparent and operate in a manner consistent with good administration.

She ruled the woman’s family was to receive €30,000 for the private nursing home fee and a further €25,000 to acknowledge the money that would have been allocated under the health repayment scheme if a public bed had been provided in 1995.

An additional €1,500 was awarded for the hardship endured by the family when they had to pay the private nursing home costs.

A spokeswoman for the HSE said human error led to the delays. The issue had been addressed.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...