US court decision could trigger many personal injury claims in Ireland

Four Courts, Dublin

5 September 2017

Thousands of personal injuries claims could be made against American companies in the Irish courts because of a landmark US Supreme Court decision.

The ruling in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. vs. Superior Court of California is understood to effectively prevent people outside the US seeking compensation in the US courts unless the harm was caused there.

However, claimants worldwide could bring claims in Ireland instead.

The Supreme Court held that the California courts lacked specific jurisdiction to entertain claims from non-resident plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit brought over a medication’s alleged side effects.

The court said: “It does not prevent the California and out-of-state plaintiffs from joining together in a consolidated action in the States that have general jurisdiction over BMS. Alternatively, the nonresident plaintiffs could probably sue together in their respective home States.”

The court’s ruling attempts to clamp down on claimants bringing litigation in the states with higher compensation payouts.

Some lawyers now believe that, deprived of that option, claimants from countries as far as Australia and New Zealand will bring cases in Ireland in a bid to seek higher compensation payments than at home.

An Irish Solicitor, who was recently elected to the board of governors of the American Association for Justice, said: “All of a sudden all of the multinationals who have registered here could be faced with lawsuits here rather than in the United States.”

He said claimants anywhere would be “perfectly entitled” to sue an Ireland-registered US company in the Irish courts.

He warned that could cause serious delays in the Irish courts because there is no dedicated system for dealing with class action lawsuits.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...