Boy who suffered brain injury in near-drowning at hotel pool settles court action for €2.5m

28 October 2021

An 11-year old boy who suffered a brain injury in a near drowning accident in a hotel swimming pool has settled his High Court action for €2.5m.

The youngster, who was not able to swim when the accident happened at the Arklow Bay Hotel, Co Wicklow, suffered the brain injury after he was found submerged in the pool on Christmas Eve seven years ago.

The boy, who cannot be named by order of the court, had been on a Christmas break with his mother and grandmother.

His counsel Liam Reidy SC told the court the family had gone to the swimming pool which was in a separate building to the hotel.

Counsel said the boy could not swim and he was in the children’s pool and in the main pool with his mother.

CCTV footage, he said, showed the child joined the mother in the main pool on one or two occasions and she led him back to the children’s pool.

Counsel said he was in the children’s pool when the mother got out of the main pool to get dressed and she thought he would follow her.

The boy’s grandmother was poolside and “momentarily could not see him”.

He was found submerged in the hotel swimming pool by the father of another child and he was resuscitated and transferred by helicopter to Temple Street Children’s Hospital.

He spent nine weeks in Temple Street and later transferred to another hospital for a prolonged stay.

The boy, who is now 17,through his mother sued Hudson Lloyd Hotel Group Ltd trading as the Arklow Bay Hotel, Arklow, Co Wicklow as a result of the accident on December 24, 2014.

It was claimed while using the swimming pool he suffered a near drowning accident there was an alleged failure to take any or any adequate precautions for the safety of the child while using the pool and an alleged failure to have a lifeguard on duty at the time he was in the pool.

It was further claimed there was a failure to notice he had got into difficulties.

All the claims were denied.

Mr Reidy told the court the issue in the case was whether there should have been a pool attendant and the hotel would allege that the mother had allegedly signed a document saying she was taking full responsibility for her son in the pool.

Counsel said the child was also with his mother and grandmother and 11 years of age at the time.

Mr Reidy said the boy had a mild learning difficulty before the accident and now has a moderate difficulty.

Counsel said he has made a remarkable physical recovery and can now walk unaided. He said the €2.5m settlement represents half the value of the case.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...