Boy who as a toddler fell 15ft through a gap in a handrail to a tiled floor settles court action for €750,000

A boy who, as a toddler, fell 15ft through a gap in a handrail onto a tiled floor in a doctor’s surgery has settled his High Court action for €750,000.

Brian Dunne (now 16), of Clonmore, Edenderry, Co Offaly, suffered extensive skull fracturing as a result of the accident in the Lowell House, Herbert Avenue, Dublin, on January 15, 2007.

He was with his mother Louise Dunne, who took the case on his behalf, while they were waiting for a medical appointment on a landing on the first floor of the premises.

It was alleged the boy, who was nearly two-and-a-half at the time, approached the stairs handrail/balustrade and fell through a six inch opening.

It was claimed, among other things, there was a failure to adequately assess the safety of the handrail or to screen it against such accidents.

He sued the operators of the centre, Somerzkroft Ltd, of Pembroke Road, Dublin, and the architect who designed the refurbishment of the building, Joseph Kennedy of Clarinda Park, Dun Laoghaire.

John Finlay SC, for the boy, said the defendants blamed one another for the accident but there was no blame attaching to the boy or his mother and there was no issue of contributory negligence.

He was stunned and upset and taken to Crumlin Children’s Hospital where he was put on ventilation and later transferred to Beaumont Hospital where it was noted he had extensive skull fractures.

While he had made a remarkable recovery, and currently played football for his local club and milked 300 cows a day on a farm, he remained at some increased risk of epilepsy as a result of his injuries, counsel said.

Ms Justice Mirian O’Regan said it seemed a good settlement and she told the boy “well done” for recovering from such a devastating accident which must have been terrible for both him and his mother.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...