Boy who allegedly tripped and hit head on utility box settles High Court action

The Four Courts

31 January 2023

A boy who allegedly tripped on a footpath and then banged his head on a utility box has settled a High Court action for €32,500.

Ryan McCarthy was 3 years old when the accident allegedly occurred on March 4th, 2013, at or near the Social Welfare Offices in Clondalkin, Dublin.

Through his father Sean McCarthy of Yellow Meadows Drive, Clondalkin, Dublin, Ryan (now 13) sued South Dublin County Council, which owned the utility box, and Chandos Investments Ltd, in liquidation, which was the owner of the path where he fell.

The court heard the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) had assessed his claim at €70,000 but the council refused to accept it and the case went through the court system with an offer of €32,500 made to settle it.

The boy’s counsel, John Scott BL, said after tripping on the path owned by the private company, which was now in liquidation, he hit the council-owned metal utility box and cut his forehead. He was left with a scar on his forehead.

The difficulty with the case was that the box was “quite far” from where the trip occurred, counsel said.

The council had now offered €32,500 which, although Mr Scott did not believe this would be accepted by a court if the case went to hearing. Counsel believed liability was against him and the offer should be accepted.

Mr Justice Garrett Simons said the PIAB assessment was interesting because it indicated the full value of the case.

But, the judge said, as counsel pointed out, there were “very significant issues” as it seemed the utility box was located some distance from where the accident occurred.

The judge shared counsel’s pessimism that if the case went to trial that the case might be dismissed.

He therefore had no hesitation in accepting the recommendation of the offer of €32,500.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...