Family of docker who died of asbestos-linked cancer settles case for €42,000

26 April 2019

The family of a Dublin docker who died seven years ago from cancer later found to be linked to asbestos dust has settled its High Court action for €42,000.

Martin Kelty (68), a father of five and a grandfather of 12 died six to eight months after the cancer was diagnosed.

John Nolan BL told the High Court today Mr Kelty had worked on Dublin docks from 1964 until his retirement in 1977. After his death in 2012, the state pathologist, Counsel at an inquest into his death noted the type of cancer Mr Kelty had was the type of disease linked to those who had been exposed to asbestos.

Mr Kelty’s daughter Emily Kelty, Cloonmore Gardens, Jobstown, Dublin had sued Burke Shipping Group, Ocean Pier, Alexandra Road Dublin and the Dublin Port company, Alexandria Road, Dublin.

Martin Kelty was a docker who started working in 1964 in the docks unloading cargo from vessels with a crane or by the use of ships derricks.

Cargoes were carried loosely in the holds of vessels and not in containers and this it was claimed was particularly so in respect of asbestos which came in bags.

The dust from the asbestos it was claimed was ingested by Mr Kelty who was unloading the vessels as it was claimed no safety equipment was provided.

It was claimed there was an alleged failure to acknowledge the dangers of asbestos and an alleged failure to assign a special berth for the docking of vessels carrying such cargoes. There was also it was claimed an alleged failure to warn Mr Kelty of the dangers of asbestos.

The claims were denied.

Counsel John Nolan told the court it was only at the inquest into Mr Kelty’s death in August 2013 that his family heard evidence from the State pathologist the cancer was linked to exposure to asbestos.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross approved the settlement.

Source: Irish Examiner

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...