Artist gets €45,000 damages after hair fell out following ‘disastrous’ salon visit

15 June 2011

A MOTHER-OF-THREE whose hair fell out after undergoing a colouring treatment at a hair salon has been awarded €45,000 in damages.

Artist and painter Aileen Dunleavy sued Hair Republic of Galway over the  treatment in March 2007.

At the High Court, Mr Justice Iarfhlaith Neill said he was quite satisfied the hairdresser was "wholly responsible" for the damages and injury Ms Dunleavy sustained.

What had happened to her was "a disaster", the judge said.

The judge dismissed claims by the defendant that Ms Dunleavy insisted on having colouring applied or had been warned it was too soon after the last time she had it done and that there was a risk of damage.

The judge said he could not accept any woman would have undergone the treatment had they been warned there was a potential risk of damaging her hair. Ms Dunleavy, the judge said, had the colouring applied by a stylist who he said was "inexperienced" and "insufficiently skilled".

The judge was also critical of the "heavy handedness" in having Ms Dunleavy’s estranged husband and his mother present in court during the proceedings.

They had been listed to give evidence on behalf of the defence, the judge noted, but were not called.

Ms Dunleavy (40), a separated mother of three from Caiseal Mara Salthill, Galway City, raised her action following the colouring treatment at the salon on March 28, 2007.

In her action, she claimed the defendant was negligent and in breach of care of duty towards her.

Negligence

While her hair has since grown back, she claimed she suffered personal injury, loss, and that the incident adversely affected both her working and social life.

The defendant pleaded contributory negligence.

Awarding the €45,000, the judge said that as a result of the trauma, Ms Dunleavy had been unable to paint in a meaningful way for 18 months after the incident. He further accepted that she had become socially withdrawn due "to the sense of embarrassment" she suffered as a result of what happened to her hair.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...