Accident victim accused of mounting sham case

15 September 2014

A Polish man suing his employer and a motorist for compensation from two accidents was accused yesterday of mounting a sham case and misleading everyone from lawyers, doctors and the defence to the High Court judge hearing the case.

Tomasz Ewertowski, of Forrest Ridge Crescent, Wilton, Cork, said at the end of the third day of his civil action: “I did not mislead anyone. If I wanted to pretend, I would lock myself at home so no one would see me. I knew private investigators were following me. They were parked outside my house so I knew it.

“I feel a victim of the whole situation. I had [accidents]. I am going to all the treatments prescribed. Do you think I was happy such accidents happened to me?”

Mr Ewertowski was employed by William Cox Ireland, who were contracted by PJ Hegarty to install glass at Blackpool shopping centre on Jan 30, 2008. He said he fell on that day while going to get a pane of glass.

The second accident happened on Jul 15, 2011, when a friend was driving him to St Mary’s hospital in Gurranabraher for treatment for the injuries sustained in the workplace accident, and their car was struck from behind at a pedestrian crossing by a car driven by Finbarr Twohig, of 69 Hollyville, Hollyhill, Cork.

Liam Gaynor, defence SC for Mr Twohig, said there was no bang or double bang as described by the plaintiff and only the most miniscule contact occurred between the cars.

Mr Gaynor said there would be video evidence showing the plaintiff with much more flexibility and movement one day after presenting at neurosurgeon, Kieran Barry’s rooms with extremely limited movement.

The plaintiff said he had bad days and good days and that, with heavy medication, he could have movement that he would not even remember having afterwards.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...