Setanta Insurance collapse leaves up to 75,000 Irish drivers at risk

Insurance

18 April 2014

Up to 75,000 van and car drivers have been advised to urgently seek alternative insurance cover following the collapse of Dublin-based Setanta Insurance.

The insurance firm, which was licensed by the Maltese Financial Services Authority(MFSA), had been in the process of winding down its business here since January.

However, at an extraordinary general meeting on Wednesday, shareholders were informed that the proposed solvent run-off of the business was no longer possible, and a decision was made to immediately dissolve the business.

As a consequence, the insurer has suspended all payments that were already in the process of being issued.

The company, which has offices in Blanchardstown, had been selling mostly commercial motor insurance through a network of brokers in the Republic since 2007. It had been popular with smaller businesses who use vans for their deliveries and trading.

The Central Bank said Setanta was not in a position to confirm if claims will be met in full since any and all claims will be subject to the relevant liquidation process, which will be overseen by the Maltese authorities.

“Policyholders should therefore make arrangements for alternative cover without delay,” it said.

The Central Bank — which has no regulatory authority over Setanta — said it was notified by the financial authorities in Malta that Setanta shareholders were winding up the company.

“The Central Bank will require Setanta to write to all policyholders to advise them of the situation and its implications for them,” it added.

It is understood the company has about 75,000 Irish-based customers on its books, down from the 100,000 it had just prior to its winding-down announcement in January.

Setanta Insurance said in a statement on its website that policyholders would be covered until they are notified of their policy being cancelled.

But it added: “Policyholders may wish to consider their right to cancel their policy and seek alternative coverage.”

Although it only trades in the Republic, the insurer was established by former chief executive Mike Matthews in Malta in 2007, with backing from a number of individuals linked to the insurance industry here.

Industry sources said the regulatory regime in Malta was considerably less onerous than in the Republic. The company never sought authorisation from the regulator to trade here but was permitted to under EU rules.

Those who were sufficiently unfortunate to buy new policies or renew their existing policies in December will lose coverage from the remaining eight months of the year.

Rachel Doyle of Piba, which represents financial brokers in Ireland, said policyholders face “a long drawn out affair” in getting claim payouts.

“Even though cover will remain in force for this period, if the insured person has an accident it is questionable whether Setanta will be able to honour the claim due to their financial situation,” she said.

“If (motorists) cancel their policy they can request a pro-rata refund.However, being realistic, given the circumstances, there is a strong possibility that refunds of premiums will not be given.”

Ms Doyle said it was unfortunate that Setanta has suspended all payments that were already in the process of being issued.

President of the Irish Brokers Association John Bissett called on the Central Bank to ensure that compensation was available to cover those consumers impacted by the sudden liquidation of Setanta Insurance.

“In the era of heightened regulation, Irish consumers need to know that they are protected regardless of where that entity is regulated.”

Setanta Insurance, a subsidiary of Malta based Setanta Insurance, was established in 2007 and was authorised to write business in Ireland by the Malta Financial Services Authority on a freedom of services basis.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...