Insurers should pass on savings to consumers

21 October 2005

The chairperson of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB), Dorothea Dowling, confirmed the public’s suspicion that insurance companies were not passing on all savings to consumers, despite lower insurance for motorists at present.

She put it rather more diplomatically to the Oireachtas Committee on Enterprise and Small Business yesterday when she said that insurance companies were not allowing consumers to see the full benefit of the savings achieved.

The savings achieved by PIAB have been impressive, including the €1.4 million it saved claimants in legal fees, which is of itself quite substantial.

Since it was established in 2003, the PIAB awarded compensation totalling €3.7m in a system that has proven to be fast and efficient.

According to its chief executive, Patricia Byron, the PIAB was delivering compensation four times cheaper than under litigation which it was established to replace.

It has received 15,500 applications, 5,500 of which have been settled or are in the process of finalising papers, and the other 10,000 are being assessed.

As she pointed out to the committee, this was very significant considering that in 2004, just below 1 billion was paid out in compensation to personal injury victims, at a cost of €400m in litigation costs.

What PIAB has achieved must represent a significant saving to insurance companies and it is to be regretted if they are not all letting the consumer benefit to the fullest extent.

Savings in legal fees are significant too, in light of the stinging criticism by the Master of the High Court, Edmund Honohan, of some members of the legal profession and how they focus on fees.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Catriona Crumlish v Health Service Executive – Court of Appeal

On Oct. 15th, The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision against Caitriona Crumlish in her claim against Letterkenny University hospital. The plaintiff alleged that there was a failure to detect and diagnose breast cancer in May 2017 resulting in an alleged...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...