€2m payout for boy who suffered injury at birth

10 October 2014

A FOUR-year-old boy who suffered brain injuries at birth is to receive an interim payment of €2m under a High Court settlement.

The hospital where Dylan Kenny was born has also apologised to the parents of the child.

Waterford Regional Hospital said it sincerely regretted the injuries caused to Dylan and "the undoubted trauma which has been suffered by his parents".

The court heard the apology was issued when the HSE admitted liability in the case last June.

Mr Justice Kevin Cross was told of the apology yesterday as Dylan settled his damages action with an initial interim payout of €2m over the next three years.

Dylan, of Beech Drive, Greenfield, Old Tramore Road, Waterford, has cerebral palsy and cannot walk independently, the court heard.

His counsel, Bruce Antoniotti, says he is a happy boy who laughs a lot and his parents can understand the few words he says.

Waterford Regional apologised "for the devastating injuries which the hospital accepts should not have happened".

Dylan, through his mother Claire O'Brien, had sued the HSE over the management of her labour and the circumstances of his birth in January 2010.

It was claimed there was a failure to monitor the foetal heart properly or at all during labour and a failure to appreciate the worrisome cardiac traces throughout the labour, as well as a failure to discern or react to the signs of foetal distress and hypoxia.

It was also claimed there was a failure to deliver Dylan as quickly as possible once there were clear signs of foetal distress.

It was further alleged there was a failure to give a candid explanation for what happened and why.

Mr Antoniotti said Dylan's parents were anxious for an order for periodic payments, as they did not want a situation to arise where he could run out of money in his lifetime. He said Dylan's parents were happy with the settlement.

Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Cross said the matter had been handled very well on behalf of Dylan.

The case will come before the court again in October 2017, when Dylan's future care needs will be assessed.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...