22-year-old man with cerebral palsy who sued over the management of his birth settles High Court action for €11m

A 22-year-old man with cerebral palsy who sued over the management of his birth has settled his High Court action for €11 million.

Keith Phelan has spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and has to use a wheelchair.

The settlement was against retired consultant obstetrician Dr Liam S Mundow of Douglas Road, Cork. Proceedings against the HSE were struck out.

Mr Phelan’s counsel, John O’Mahony SC, told the court serious consideration should have been given to the delivery of Keith on November 30, 1998 when the pregnancy was at 33 weeks. Dr Mundow told her she would be taken in to hospital 12 days later.

“Dr Mundow indicated he was going on holiday, hunting, and she would be brought in to hospital on December 12,” counsel said.

It was their case that the baby should have been delivered on November 30. When Mrs Phelan went to her GP on December 11 there was a red flag as she complained of the lack of foetal movement.

She was brought to St Finbarr’s Hospital, Cork and Keith was delivered by emergency Caesarean section.

The baby had to be resuscitated, counsel said.

Mr Phelan, of Raheen Road, Youghal, Co Cork had through his mother Margaret Phelan, sued the HSE and Dr Mundow.

It was claimed there was a failure to properly investigate, diagnose or treat the true nature of her condition and her baby and that there was a delayed admission of Mrs Phelan to hospital.

Dr Mundow admitted that Mrs Phelan should have been hospitalised on November 30, 1998 with management in the form of close monitoring or delivery but denied other matters.

The HSE denied all claims in the case.

Mrs Phelan, who was a private patient of Dr Mundow, attended with the consultant obstetrician when she was 33 weeks pregnant and was noted to be suffering from hypertension.

It was determined she would attend at St Finbarr’s and at the hospital on November 24, 1998. It was claimed the hypertension along with headaches elevated blood pressure with mild pre eclamptic toxaemia were noted. She was informed that all was well with her pregnancy.

Six days later on November 30 1998, it is claimed Mrs Phelan attended at Dr Mondow’s private rooms and he noted hypertension, protein in the urine and her blood pressure.

She was informed that her pregnancy was to be managed with an admission into hospital on December 12, 1998.

It was claimed that Dr Mundow allegedly advised Mrs Phelan he would be away the following week.

On December 11, 1998, after attending her GP, she was immediately admitted to St Finbarr’s Hospital.

In the hospital a CTG trace of the baby’s heartbeat was commenced and it showed a flat trace. It was decided in the light of the abnormal CTG that the baby might be at risk of hypoxia.

Keith was delivered by emergency Caesarean section. He later had seizures. An MRI scan later showed a brain injury.

It was claimed there was a failure to properly investigate, diagnose or treat the true nature of the mother’s condition.

In particular it is claimed there was a failure to diagnose that the baby’s situation was such as to require immediate attention where the outcome was rendered significantly more adverse by any delay .

The baby’s health was as a result of the alleged inadequate and improper management and treatment jeopardised, and he was significantly deprived of the opportunity of a materially better outcome than would otherwise have been the case.

Approving the settlement Mr Justice Kevin Cross congratulated Keith’s parents and family for all their work for their son.

Outside court Solicitor Ciaran McCarthy on behalf of the family said it had been a long journey for them.

They thanked their legal team, supporters and professional witnesses who assisted them and the courtesy they were shown along the way.

“This has been a long journey and it will make a huge difference to Keith’s life and his family. They have been extremely united “ he said .

Keith’s sisters Kelly and Lindsay were also in court for the ruling of the settlement.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Autistic cinema manager wins €12k over discrimination in roster row

An autistic cinema manager who quit when his employer was unable to guarantee him two days off in a row following a months-long dispute over rostering arrangements has secured €12,000 in compensation for disability discrimination. The complainant's wife gave evidence...

Northern Ireland exam board boss wins £100,000 settlement

Northern Ireland’s Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) has paid a substantial settlement to its former interim chief executive who complained of sex, race and age discrimination and constructive dismissal. The sum paid to Margaret Farragher,...

Recent Articles

Psychological Injury

Nervous Shock I The law allows recovery of damages for so called nervous shock, within certain parameters and subject to limitations.  Nervous shock is the most commonly used legal label for psychiatric or psychological injury. Psychiatric injuries include...

Public Authorities and Negligence

Powers and Duties In broad terms, public authorities are subject to civil liability for negligence and other civil wrongs, in the same way as private individuals and companies.  The State and other public bodies are responsible for the actions and omissions of...

Duty of Care (Part 2)

Limits to Neighbour Principle The famous neighbour principle re-stated the general basis of liability in negligence. It stated, that “you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your...

Duty of Care (Part 1)

Meaning of Negligence I Negligence is used in a number of senses.  In one sense, it refers to a person’s state of mind.  An act is negligent, where it is done without giving due weight to the risks involved.  A person  (and his state of mind) may...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...