Boy injured by exploding light bulb awarded €27,000 damages

selective focus photography of turned on light bulb

25 November 2021

A 10-year-old schoolboy, whose face was injured when a light bulb in his bedside lamp exploded, has won €27,000 damages for personal injuries.

Barrister Daniel Coyle told the Circuit Civil Court that Joseph Carney was only six years old when he suffered cuts to his left lower eyelid and cheek.

Mr Coyle, who appeared with Joseph, told Judge Cormac Quinn that two stores, Dealz and Ikea, had offered the boy the €27,000 settlement and he was recommending it to the court.

Counsel said Joseph, who sued both stores through his mother Clodagh Carney, of Bailes, Dunleer, Co Louth, had been in bed on December 12th, 2016 when the bulb in his bedside lamp spontaneously exploded.

Mr Coyle told the court that his mother had found her son covered in glass in his bed and with blood trickling down his cheek. She had taken him to Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda, from where he had been transferred to Temple Street Childrens’ Hospital where his wounds were conservatively treated.

Judge Quinn, who heard that Joseph had suffered a small puncture wound to his left lower eyelid and a burn abrasion to his cheek, approved the settlement offer.

Mr Coyle said that the bedside lamp had been bought in Ikea and the bulb had been purchased in a local Dealz store. The settlement had been reached in negotiations with both firms.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Pay Now, Argue Later: Unravelling the Townmore Judgement’s Impact on Irish AdjudicationsJudical review and statutory adjudication

The recent “Townmore” judgement in Ireland sheds some light on the ongoing legal debate about the role of judicial reviews in statutory adjudications, emphasizing the “pay now, argue later” principle highlighted in the Construction Contracts Act 2013, and indicating that early judicial reviews could contradict the act’s intent of prompt payment, although the option for judicial review post the final decision on substantive disputes remains undetermined.

Transforming Personal Injury Resolution: PIAB’s New Framework

The Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) has undergone a substantial overhaul, introducing mandatory medical reports, identification requirements, and detailed incident descriptions to expedite personal injury claim resolution as of September 4, 2023. These changes, along with measures already in place such as deemed offers of tender and extended claim retention, aim to reduce fraudulent claims, enhance efficiency, and ultimately lower costs for insurers.

Recent Articles

New PIAB Legislation: What You Need to Know Now!

Navigate the new PIAB legislation changes impacting personal injury claims with our comprehensive guide, and discover how the Irish Claims Board can provide a free assessment of your claim before formal submission.

Solicitor’s Fees in Ireland

Understanding the various ways solicitors charge their clients in claims cases in Ireland, including hourly rates, fixed fees, and conditional fees (with restrictions), is important for those seeking legal representation, and utilising the Irish Claims Board is an alternative to consider.

Alternatives to litigation in Ireland

Overview of alternatives to litigation Reference to arbitration is commonplace in commercial contracts. However, there is an increasing trend towards consent-based forms of ADR such as mediation and expert determination as more flexible and cost-efficient ADR...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...

Pay Now, Argue Later: Unravelling the Townmore Judgement’s Impact on Irish AdjudicationsJudical review and statutory adjudication

Pay Now, Argue Later: Unravelling the Townmore Judgement’s Impact on Irish AdjudicationsJudical review and statutory adjudication

The recent “Townmore” judgement in Ireland sheds some light on the ongoing legal debate about the role of judicial reviews in statutory adjudications, emphasizing the “pay now, argue later” principle highlighted in the Construction Contracts Act 2013, and indicating that early judicial reviews could contradict the act’s intent of prompt payment, although the option for judicial review post the final decision on substantive disputes remains undetermined.

Don`t copy text!